Two hypothesizes are put forward to, one is because that the industrial structure changed lowly, the other is the contribution of the three industrial structure change to the economic growth changing too acutely, which declined the influence.
英
美
- 文中提出了兩個(gè)解釋假說(shuō),一是這段時(shí)期東北的產(chǎn)業(yè)結構變動(dòng)十分緩慢,不足以影響經(jīng)濟增長(cháng); 二是三次產(chǎn)業(yè)對經(jīng)濟增長(cháng)的貢獻率波動(dòng)太大,此消彼長(cháng),削弱了其對經(jīng)濟增長(cháng)的影響。
